Anna Russo
INTELLIGIBILITY of NATURE II°
pmanzelli@gmail.com ; www.egocreanet.it; www.edscuola.it/LRE.html; www.wbabin.net
FUTURE EVOLUTION OF NOT HIDDEN NOR OBSCURED Q.BIO-PHYSICS MODELS
HIDDEN MEANING : Paris fashion shows 2006 , www.nytimes.com
FROM : GOOGLE IMAGES SEARCH. http://images.google.com/
Following the dualistic experimental observation of nature of quantum “wave/particles”, light energy (E) as well matter (M) behave to a double quantum interpretation of energy/matter interaction .This two modes of understanding has shaped the course of the Quantum Mechanics (Q.M.) in the last century. The fundamental implication of the duality of Q.M suggests that it is no possible to know reality through a cause effect logic as in the Classical Physics . So that Q.M. subsequently at the Uncertainty Principle (1927) , suggests that in a deeper level, existing under the macro world , the successful description of reality scientifically available, is based only on a probabilistic approach of knowing.
Albert Einstein remains isolated from the current interpretation of the Q.M., this because he would never accept the dead of linear causality and quoted : “God does not play dice with the universe“. Hence Einstein spent thirty years attempting to unify al physical laws in the General Relativity, without any success so that an unified possibility of a physics intelligibility of reality remains incomplete to us today. As a matter of facts the interpretation of physical phenomena persists to be based upon some rather broad assumptions , as the arbitrary splitting form subject and object of the physical observation.
This arbitrary separation of the observer from the concept of physics , close the intelligibility of nature in a reductive mode, continuously forced in the tradition of a mechanical science understanding. In any case physical science, during the last century, produces very important theoretical assumptions, based on various equations, mathematically demonstrable at a good quantitative reply; but forever this mathematical approach remains closed into an evident paradigmatic incorrectness, and, as a consequence of the limited assumption the creative reasoning, science falls in the proper method of predictability, essentially because never considers belonging to the observed Nature the observer her/sheself.
To go beyond the current realm of science the EGOCREANET / Open network for new Science and Art , take a decision (2004) to start again to centre the re-examination of “Science and Art” focusing the “Man”, as in the tradition of Florence Renaissance period , born at the times of Leonado da Vinci.
“ONNS&A” -Generative Research Protocol
Following the C.S. Peirce’s classification of semeiotics for an effective generative knowledge creation and communication, the EGOCREANET /ONNS&A research protocol of the “Science of Quality”, will be the following :
(a) “firstness- difference”: activate an innovative research to change the traditional modality of searching only for mathematical demonstrations, in order to build up an intensive trans-disciplinary conceptual “bio-physics”. In fact, despite the differences of living systems and mechanical ones , a fundamental set of complementary logic will find their coexistence aiming to select the fundamental forms of diverse codification of energy. Three basic forms of Energy codification (Free Energy (E) , Energy codified like Matter (M) and Information Energy ( I ), can be chosen, rather than spend effort in searching for long and tedious derivations of numerical formulas on the basis of the interaction between energy and matter. Henceforth this characteristic triadic approach would have a preference to enhance a critical revision of the mechanical paradigm, expressing this critique, within a clear language and using a set of visual stimuli produced in terms of art’s images and graphic-questions. In fact the effective Nature embodying the “Man” , not only utilize the language of the numbers, but often prefers a creative fluent modes of meaning definitions by means of different symbol’s production as teach us the Artistic methodology of communication.
(b) “secondness -actions”: A opening action will be to introduce into the Conservation of the Total Energy the “Information Energy” , as a new form of energy codification. Following this aperture in science it is possible to develop subsequent original activities, particularly focused to give a better interpretation of the biological communication. In fact inside of “Man” , the brain do not work directly manipulate external lighting rays or sound’s notes, or other known forms of physical energy, this because inside of the brain, biological materials, (neurons, nerves, neuro-transmitters, ormons etc.. ) are not row materials , and also bio-electric energy , interact in order to transform in “mental information”, the input of quantum wave/particles, received through the sensory receptors. Therefore starting from the brain it is becoming admissible a new kind of “Information Energy” ( I ), and we suppose that (I) can be codified in a new space-time dimension, that never it is taken in account in the old mechanic paradigm of science. In fact today (I) as energy it is becoming of straightforward importance to initiate to understand more profoundly also the biology of thinking process in science and art by crossing internal and external reality.
(c)“thirdness -relations”: To support the opening of a original debate to provide conceptual sharing-test about the emergent properties of the new paradigm , that include the goal a better quality of the “Intelliggibility of Nature” , by means of a more complete causal field entangling Science and Art in relation to the triadic interconnections among the three fundamental codification of Energy in terms of Matter (M) , vibration- Energy (E) and Information Energy (I).
The Lost Ring in Science
http://steelgohst.deviantart.com/
The ring of the conjunction of cause and domain can be originally considered found starting from 1935, when Erwin Schrödinger(1887-1961) develops an original definition of the concept of ENTANGLEMENT, obtained through a condensed structure of two different quantum-particles. The entangling effect happen when to independent “quanta” will be forced to be confined in the same space-time location, generating as a consequence, an new possibility of “no- local ” communication. The Entangling effect permits to Schroedinger to believe that an generalised entangling process among various wave/particles, would be useful for bridging mechanical science to living science (2), (3) .In spite of this conjecture of Schroedinger, till more recent times , the Entanglement effect would be considered only as an exceptional instable behaviour, so that the important Entanglement quantum interactivity, received no more attention in Quantum Science. This common scientific mentality in fact correspond to insufficient studies made in order to reinterpreting the wave/particle dualism .In addition the media-power of Albert Einstein get an high responsibility to stop the quantum theory innovation , because he affirmed that the “no local communicatiation” certainly need to be seen as a not credible “Sporky action at Distance”.
NOT ONCE BUT TWICE SOLUTION : BLUE SILENCE IN COMMUNICATION -by :PABLO PICASSO.
As a consequence also the evidence of an experiment performed by Alain Aspect (1982) about the distant communication of entangled Quantum-particles, do not operate any substantial scientific change of the academic conventions about the absolute space -time structure in order to understand the possibility of simultaneity in teleportation of pure “Information Energy”. ( 4).
Therefore the EGOCREANET/ONNS&A, research group suggests : till that giving up the will to maintain the universal concept of locality the quantum experiment that evidence the no local are not sufficient to be consistent with a changing mentality of the scientific disciplinary realm , unless certain intuitive features of realism are abandoned. To surpass the BURIDAN DONKEY difficulty to chose between local and non-local reality , the ONNS&A research group proposes to consider a complete permutation of the Space-time matrix, in order to codify in different structures of the four-vector in a way to justify both , the local transfer of communication of information and the no-local simultaneous teleportation. The above cognitive goal is founded on the to understand the complementary process of coding and decoding of the four-vector matrix , generating three not-unitary space time structures. This research purpose evidently posses an high challenging difficulty but any way will be the focus of the future ONNS&A generative research in trans-disciplinary Semiotics in Bio-Quantum Physics. (5)
Multiple Causal Matrix in a complex intelligibility of nature.
It is well known that semiotics is the study of sign signification and signals communication it is a fundamental sector of semiotics in living systems . Therefore it will be of decisive importance for advancing in the EGOCREANET-ONNS&A research, to analyse the semiotic ’s relationships among the permutation of space-time structure in correspondence with a generation of a multiple causal-matrix. As a matter of facts each “typology” of causality obey to the “topology” of Space –Time , so that we can understand that changing the relative structure of the four vectors matrix. also a matrix of causation criteria need to be modulated in terms of a series of various correlation between space-time-structures and multiple with alternative of the cause-effect domain .
In particular the transition from one regime of timing dimensions to another change the causation rules driven by three modes of complementary causation providing a deeper understanding in expanding horizons of science reasoning and aesthetic epistemology in art :
1) Deterministic- Causality correspond to one dimension of irreversible time arrow. .
2) Super –causality is a consequence of simultaneity of two dimension of biology time- arrows
3) Iper –causality , need to be applied in correlation with three time arrows.
Therefore embedding in the cosmological horizon more than one time’s dimension we discover the possibility to think to an “relational reality” in correlation with a “dynamical determinism” . So that if in relation of three equivalent topology of 4D space-time matrix, we add the Information Energy (I) to the other fundamental of codification e.g. free-Energy (E) and Matter –Energy (M), in order to maintain the conservation of total energy, we obtain that the whole Universe in its integrity as “ONE”, can be split in three “equivalent blocks” (IEM + EMI +MIE ) representative of a set of triadic equations, governing three kinds of complementary evolution.
In fact those blocks are, as in a coloured kaleidoscope, not separated by physical boundaries, this because the three equations are nor representative of opposite rules, but they can interpret transient modes of topological affinity among “no forbidden” differential construction of the space-time matrix.
- Rationale about the relationships among Space-time permutation and Causation Matrix.
Knowledge process in science art during the contemporary development of knowledge society , tend to use different multiple chances of causality in a various modality of thought that not always enrich a very consciously involvement of people. (6)
1) The “Deterministic Causality” . It is well known that can a be a useful model in the classic formalisation of causation that has its central focus on believing to an successive action/reaction like in pendulum dynamics. Certainly the deterministic causality rules attempts to fail in a false predictability of effective expectations, if the dynamics of change becomes out of side of linear equilibrium dynamics as in the living systems. Therefore for avoiding the complete lost of science predictability of deterministic causal connections, Quantum Mechanics prefers to split the macro- from the micro-cosmos, subdividing the classical certainty based on forecasting the mechanical motion in macro-systems, into an imperfect probability to know, formulated through the “Uncertainty Principle ”, as the only possibility to understand the dynamics of interactions between quantum particles. Therefore the acquisition of two kind of forecasting expectations in macro and micro system, open various problems in science, between chaos and ordered transformations . All those problems gives also the opportunity to develop particular resolutions using “n-dimensional iper-spaces within an unique time dimension”, so that so often, this mathematical methodology , give rise to extreme paradoxes in relation to the never ended need to connect by a causation the inter-dependences between macro and micro cosmos.
2) The “Super Causality” corresponds to a more elevated level of understanding the existence of a double time arrows , finding a complemented solution between clock time of external reality and circadian time of internal perception.
Two arrow of time :
Templar idea of supernatural dead of both “body and spirit”.
The brain in fact do not see directly external objects, but only through information energy signals and transform those information input, in signs and significations of object visual representation . Hence the nature of information get not an immediate sense, but permit a simultaneity of correspondence between external reality changes and the internal brain’s processes of dynamic interpretation . Therefore we need to admit the complementary existence of the analytic process of recognition of the different areas of the brain , that will be too much slow if there are not a complementary possibility to realise an contemporary simultaneity of information to be conscious of what we perceive.
Distinct parallel states of Brain’s regions all belonging to an simultaneous conscious scenario
As a matter of facts simultaneous events may appear to coincide in time and space because the two dimensional structure in bits of Space (S) and Time (T) of Information Energy. Therefore the Space- Time permutation from ( 3D.S + 1D.T) dimensions to (2D.S + 2D.T) get more coherence of both “clock and circadian” double dynamics. Therefore in the context of a “super-causality” permitted by a new space-time paradigm , can become possible to discover obscure meanings that before are hidden to a better intelligibility of nature . At present phase of ONNS&A
FICTION of THE FUTURE OF UNIVERSE
opened a research among the relationships between “Space-Time and relative Causation” Matrices” , in a way to understand the effective logical possibility of existence of the simultaneity of “no local information”, that is forbidden when the structure of space and time is defined through the traditional space time framework.
Finally a valid approach to understand the other emerging types of causality above cited as “iper-causality”, will be related to the need to find a multiple relationship of the space time
frames permutation, in the evolution of Universe. This research goal is oriented to find a coherent correspondence among the three lines of time ( past ,present and future) and only one dimension of space. For the scope of our current paper the “Iper- causality in correlation with (1D.S + 3D.T) space –time topology”, would not be undertaken now in a deep consideration, because this kind of correlations, turning forward a complete reversion of the Cartesian dominion of space-time , is evidently a problem of the great complexity that need of a general revision of the mechanical science, driven by the idea to introduce an to innovative rationale about the gravity as a kind of information energy.
BIBLIO ON LINE
(1) Science of Quality : http://www.edscuola.it/archivio/lre/science_of_quality_1.htm
(2) Schroedinger Entanglement :http://qubit.damtp.cam.ac.uk/users/matthias/Entanglement/Entanglement.php
(3) What Means Life :http://www.edscuola.it/archivio/lre/what_means_life.htm
(4) Bio Quantum Physics : http://www.wbabin.net/papers.htm
(5) INTELLIGIBILITY OF NATURE: http://www.edscuola.it/archivio/lre/intelliggibility_of_nature.pdf
(6) Causality Fades and Fails : http://critcrim.org/redfeather/chaos/002causality.html
Anteprima del commento