A cura di Aldo Vincent
Pubblicato il 25/02/2006
Testimonianze e versioni...
CHI HA ATTACCATO IL SANTUARIO A SAMARRA?
DA BAGHDAD DWELLER (BLOG DI UN IRACHENO)
Pensateci in modo logico: la moschea a Samarra era lì secoli fa, non era mai stata assalita, attaccata e nessun danno era stato fatto prima d'ora all'edificio.
A partire dall'occupazione, la moschea è diventata un "bersaglio possibile" ma non è successo nulla, dunque perché adesso? E come potrà qualcuno trarre beneficio da un tale attacco?
IN ITALIANO:
http://www.comedonchisciotte.org/site/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1857
VERSIONE AMERICANA:
http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/13880446.htm
Explanations for failure in Samarra vary
By Tom Lasseter
Knight Ridder Newspapers
SAMARRA, Iraq - U.S. Army commanders gave several reasons that the American effort to secure and rebuild Samarra has stumbled:
- U.S. officials don't fully understand the city's tribal structure and its connections to the insurgency. Smuggling long has been an important source of income for tribes in the area, and Capt. Scott Brannon, who commands the company of soldiers that's responsible for Samarra, said local
VERSIONE ARABA:
http://www.iraqirabita.org/index.php?do=article&id=3061
in arabo
http://www.roadstoiraq.com/
in inglese
« “Freedom of Speach”: Movies
“Freedom of Speach”: revisionists and videos »
DUE TESTIMONI OCULARI:
The night before the bombing: Two eyewitnesses
The perfect controlled demolition.
Take a good look at the picture above because I will tell you what I see.
I see a damaged dome caused by an explosion set very professionally that the two minarets from the both sides weren’t effected by the explosion.
Not even one single “gold plate” fall down from the minarets while the explosion was so heavy that caused the collapse of the dome.
Tell me, Is this work of few terrorists who wants to finish the job as fast as possible?
